PARAKIYA-BHAVA: The Hidden Cost of Sacred Paramour Love (part 3)

In the first two parts of this series, we explored parakiya-bhava as the soul’s most daring gesture—a love so absolute that it transgresses safety, law, and reason to answer the Divine’s intimate call. We began with the tremor of longing—what Tamara called the “erotic decision”—and moved into the cost of that fidelity, the price of love that demands everything. Now, in this concluding reflection, we turn to its culmination—the mystery of radha-dasyam, sometimes known as manjari-bhava: the intimate service of those who live only to serve the one who loves most. Their entire being is defined by fearless, self-forgetful passion, poured at the feet of the supreme Lover (Krishna) through her who embodies love itself—the supreme Goddess Sri Radha.

In Gaudiya Vaishnavism, radha-dasyam indicates servitude to this Goddess of love, and is celebrated as the pinnacle of devotion—the final flowering of parakiya-bhava into selfless, ever-fresh service. Yet this ideal, often spoken of with reverence, is also frequently approached from a distance. We admire its poetry, we sing its glories, but we rarely pause to imagine what it truly means—to live as those who love as she loves. For many, it remains a beautifully untouchable symbol, a platonic horizon of aspiration rather than a living vocation.

Others, sensing its sublimity, rush to claim it prematurely—charmed by its language but unprepared for its fire—without having allowed its implications to ripen in the soil of their own experience. Yet this very haste betrays what the ideal itself demands: patience, depth, and surrender.

The essence of radha-dasyam is not theoretical—it is embodied, raw, and existential. It is to live in service to love’s own unfolding, to continually die to self-interest so that love alone might breathe through us.

To serve Radha is to participate in the ongoing necessity of love’s growth. Divine love is not static; it is a living organism, ever-evolving, endlessly expanding. To serve her, then, is to serve that very evolution—to be ready to be changed by what love requires next. This is the realism of the path and the yardstick for genuine maturity in bhakti. The higher peaks of dedication are not for escape or ornamentation but for a deep, grounded participation in the mystery of love’s perpetual becoming. To speak of manjari-bhava is to speak of souls who have surrendered the right even to love directly; they exist only to assist the love between the Divine Couple. They live as the pulse of compassion itself—transparent, tender, utterly given. Their fulfillment lies not in direct personal union but in witnessing and serving the union of God and Goddess. In such divine self-forgetfulness, individuality reaches its purest expression.

In connection with radha-dasyam, the Gaudiya tradition locates the apex of love not where it is most celebrated, but where it is most vulnerable—a place known as Radha-kunda. This sacred spot stands as the supreme place for Gaudiya Vaishnavas not because it is the most serene or aesthetically perfect, but because it is where the risk of love reaches its highest pitch. Srila B. R. Sridhara Deva Goswami once described Radha-kunda as the highest site because that’s where the greatest sacrifice was being offered. Another word for “sacrifice” here would be “risk-taking”: in Radha-kunda meeting and even full consummation occurs between the Divine Couple not in the sheltering darkness of night, as in the rasa-lila, but under the open blaze of midday.

There, everything is exposed.

Nothing hides.

The risk is total.

And yet, that is precisely why it is the holiest place—because love dares to appear in the full light, even when such exposure may cost everything.

Love, then, is not measured by secrecy or safety, but by the degree of vulnerability it embraces. In fact, the very first thing Sri Krishna asks of the gopis as they venture toward him in their abhisara—the secret tryst—is to risk everything: their name, their families, their very lives. To enter that forest is to step beyond every social boundary. The greater the risk, the greater the revelation.

This risk, when transposed into our own lives, takes countless forms. It may mean stepping away from relationships or systems that no longer serve truth, or relinquishing the comfort of our own religious identities to follow the subtle movements of grace. It may mean learning to love those who do not love us back, or to keep faith in moments when every sign of love seems to vanish. In this sense, Radha-kunda is not a geographical site alone; it is a mirror held up to the soul—a luminous threshold where love asks for honesty, proximity, and the courage to be revealed. The seeker who truly approaches that sacred water does not seek safety, but exposure—the tender kind that makes nearness possible. The divine sun burns away pretense until only the essence of longing remains.

Intimacy is what exposure is for: the nearness of the Divine that we often resist because nearness reveals. We long for closeness, yet fear being seen; we speak of love, yet recoil before transparency. When we have not been trained in self‑compassion, intimacy sounds terrifying, for to be close means to be known—and to be known means to surrender every disguise. The paradox is that Krishna’s love comes so near that we miss it; accustomed to a distant God, we look outward while the Beloved is already within the room, inviting us to step closer.

Because of this, intimacy must be learned like a language. It begins in ordinary places—naming what we feel, creating safe spaces of trust, practicing vulnerability without self‑betrayal. We “train for love” the way Radha trains, as we’ll see, for thorns: not by waiting for obstacles to vanish, but by preparing our body, mind, and heart to meet them tenderly. When we cultivate emotional honesty, humble courage, and mutual protection, the soul becomes capable of standing in the midday light without flinching.

Without this apprenticeship, we reach for substitutes—distractions that mimic closeness while sparing us its cost. Much of our culture offers intimacy at a distance: spectacle instead of presence, stimulation instead of communion. Such shortcuts leave the heart unfed and the will untrained. Real intimacy, like the one parakiya‑bhava offers but also demands, asks for proximity and exposure: not merely to feel more, but to let love read us—so that our defenses become doors and our wounds, places of meeting.

From here, it follows naturally: at this height, love is not merely a sentiment but the ultimate ethic. All lesser moralities find their completion and transfiguration here. Parakiya-bhava is not the rejection of duty, but its fulfillment at a higher octave. When Radha steps into the forest, she is not breaking vows; she is keeping the highest vow updated—the vow to never betray love itself. Even when that means breaking every other vow, she remains true. This is anyabhilasita-sunyam in living form—the absence of all desires except to love, serve, and please the Beloved.[1] To live by such an ethic is to recognize that love alone is the measure of righteousness, and that faithfulness to that love often requires unfaithfulness to every other idol.

Love dismantles what intellect defends. As The Forty Rules of Love reminds us: “Intellect ties people in knots and risks nothing, but love dissolves all tangles and risks everything.” The intellect advises, “Beware of too much ecstasy,” while love whispers, “Take the plunge.” The treasures, as the Sufis say, are hidden among the ruins.[2]

The Gaudiya scriptures illustrate this ethic of love through exquisite imagery. The poet Govinda Dasa describes Radha training herself for the perilous path of the nocturnal tryst:

To prepare herself for walking over the thorny pathways on the way to the trysting-grove at night, Radha strews thorns over her yard in the daytime and learns how to tolerate their pricks. She learns how to wrap her anklebells into her cloth, so that she can run at night without making any sound. She throws water over her yard in the daytime to learn how to walk over slippery paths at night, and she covers her eyes with her hands in the daytime to learn how to walk in the dark at night. Also, she rewards a snake-charmer with a jewelled bangle for teaching her a mantra that will stifle the snakes that might attack her at night and that will protect her from the attacks of wild beasts of prey. For Krishna’s sake Radha takes even unlimited misery to be like great bliss!”[3]

This is not sentimental exaggeration but sacred realism. Radha’s daily training becomes a theology of embodiment: she does not wait for grace to remove obstacles—she trains her body, mind, and heart to meet them with readiness. She makes difficulty her discipline. Her devotion rehearses endurance. In her, suffering becomes apprenticeship; preparation itself becomes prayer. She turns her whole being into readiness for love’s next demand. And through her example, we are shown that every hardship in life can become training ground for tenderness. What pierces us prepares us.

To contemplate her sacrifice is to be drawn into empathy so deep it becomes a form of theology. To love Radha is to share her wounds, to see that her tears are not weakness but a language of communion. Her joy is not comfort but the bliss that shines only through surrender. To serve her is to allow one’s own life to become a vessel for her compassion—a willingness to suffer, forgive, and love beyond measure.

In this way, approaching the higher peaks of divine love must always be a sustainable and realistic project. We are not called merely to be charmed by the ideal or by its poetic descriptions, but to understand its implications and embody them in the most tangible way.

Risk-taking, fearlessness, and the dedication to tend to love’s necessities are not abstract virtues—they reveal themselves in the ordinary moments that knock on our door each day. How willing are we to embrace those challenges as expressions of love’s apprenticeship?

If we can connect these dots properly, the journey itself becomes nourishment, preparing our hearts to authentically receive the ultimate reality of parakiya-bhava and radha-dasyam. This is not an intellectual attainment or a mystical status to be claimed, but a gradual awakening of the heart that the Srimad-Bhagavatam and other scriptures gently prepare us for. Every verse, every story, every song is meant to sensitize us—to refine our longing until it vibrates with her own pulse of divine courage and holy daring.

As many teachers warn, radha-dasyam cannot be entered cheaply. It is not a crown for the learned but a cross for the surrendered. It asks of us the same courage Radha embodies: the courage to lose everything for love, to prefer vulnerability over victory, exposure over protection.

This is precisely what Sri Krishna came to reveal when he appeared as Sri Chaitanya. In his golden form, he not only entered the burning sweetness of Radha’s love, but embodied the cost of honoring it—the price of letting love unmake and remake us. Through his tears, his longing, and his ecstasies, he showed that fidelity to love requires a willingness to be transformed by its fire, where divine joy and divine sorrow merge into a single, luminous offering.

And so, at the close of his earthly lila, Chaitanya did not simply taste her mood—he surrendered into it completely, showing what it means to be carried beyond oneself by the Beloved. For those who aspire to such an ideal, the scripture says:

To the extent one worships the lotus feet of Sri Chaitanya with devotion, to that extent the nectar of Radha’s feet spontaneously arises in the heart.”[4]

The more we meditate upon this mystery, the clearer it becomes that the path of love is not a gradual climb toward certainty but a slow surrender into trembling fidelity. Yet even this surrender requires a foundation. Love’s risk does not grow out of recklessness but out of trust—an inner security that allows us to leap without despair.

The soul can dare only when it feels held. True fearlessness, therefore, is born not from denying our need for safety, but from resting that need in the embrace of the Divine. The deeper our sense of shelter, the greater our capacity for holy risk. And yet, the moment we surrender into that embrace, something unexpected happens: what once felt like safety begins to dissolve into wonder. Love itself becomes the new ground—and it trembles.

Love leaves us trembling—not because it weakens us, but because it strips us of all false stability. As Srila B. R. Sridhara Deva Goswami used to say, pratistha means the craving for stability at every step—the subtle desire to be established, to be safe, to be recognized. But bhakti asks for abhayatva—fearlessness—the boldness to be undone. The gopis live this vow more radically than any monk. Their lives are renunciations not of pleasure but of the very illusion of control. And so the spiritual path, at its truest, is not the religion of law-abiding piety but of holy disobedience—a refusal to let fear dictate the limits of love. Being is dying by loving.

When we contemplate parakiya-bhava, we stand before the secret of existence itself. The universe was born from divine longing; the soul’s journey ends in its consummation. Between those two moments stretches the long apprenticeship of desire—learning, as Sri Radha did (and continues to do), to make even pain a form of devotion, even loss a gesture of fidelity.

The path of parakiya-bhava began with trembling recognition—with the call to risk. It matured through the price of love—the death of ego and safety. And it now culminates in radha-dasyam—where we no longer love to possess, but to serve love itself. Here, devotion ceases to be about what we gain, and becomes about what love gains through us.

This is the full circle: the soul becomes the servant of love’s own movement.

The Beloved becomes the guide.

The longing becomes its own fulfillment.

And thus, the final lesson of parakiya-bhava is not to love safely, nor even bravely, but to love until nothing remains but love itself.

 

 ENDNOTES  

[1] Rupa Goswami, Bhakti-rasamrita-sindhu 1.1.11.

[2] Elif Shafak, The Forty Rules of Love, p. 66.

[3] Quoted by Ananta Dasa Pandita in his purport to Prabodhananda Sarasvati, Radha-rasa-sudhanidhi 21.

[4] Prabodhananda Sarasvati, Chaitanya-chandramrita 88.

Share the Post:

Related Posts